What will cost less to payment system users; large multi-national
government projects, or, large single firm projects? Can a consortium of firms
with in-country monopoly rights create the best cost for consumers, or will Ed’s
Bait and Virtual Currency Shoppe, actually offer consumers the best prices for
the same service?
Maybe dear reader(s) a consensus exits that security of
currency during transport is a primary element to consider during payment system
design phases. Speed of completion of an entire transaction from initial
clearing to final settlement becomes a primary consideration for designers
because of the common risks to payment systems, namely: liquidity, credit, operational,
legal, and systemic risk.
A mined virtual currency fails because of the time for
validation. One cycle takes ten minutes and during that time the status of the
coin remains uncertain. In the real world, when the coin leaves the bum’s
pocket the transaction takes as long as the time it takes for the coin to move
from the bum to the bum’s friend. There
may be recrimination about the consequences of the movement, but the time of
final settlement is quite clear.
Diagram 13 shows a virtual currency system run by a single
nation for the purposes of discussion.
Diagram 13 A Virtual Currency Operated by a Central Bank
If the currency has nominal counterfeit protection, potential
payees may not use the validation window much regardless of the value size of
the transaction. If the system cannot
prevent unauthorized value from entering the system the validation window will
not prevent desertion by its users regardless of the cost of the transaction. Validation
needs to occur in microseconds from any correctly formatted query regardless of
its source.
Next Blog: Response
to comments, or, new functions for virtual currency
No comments:
Post a Comment