I write this open letter to the European Telecommunications
Standards Institute (ETSI), Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), the
United States Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed), the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), and the European Central Bank (ECB) to propose that you
folks get together and create a tagged base data standard (like ISO 20022) for
transportation of payment data to financial institutions (FI) from personal
electronic devices (PED).
It’s important the standard be flexible (allow many
different types of encryption methods for example) and yet transport the
minimum data to enable a push of funds from the payer account to the payee(s)
account. If large respected institutions create an open standard that meet
requirements for payments at least for the group of 20, then manufacturers can
produce personal electronic devices containing acceptable applications that
push funds to payees.
If on the other hand, manufacturers create their own
specifications, large individual firms will produce proprietary schemes that
lock out competitors and create a Tower of Babel for a vital communication
network. Further a standard specification creates a minimum security posture
for the initiation of payment pushes giving confidence that devices will not be
lax creating a minimally acceptable effort to protect payer funds.
It is in the best interest of financial institutions that
have regulations in place to protect the public in a reasonable and unobtrusive
way to specify a safe method to initiate payment instructions and receive
notification of results. Further the current retail payment architecture creates
monopolistic practices with banks and network providers setting fees as a
single entity rather than competing by offering various fee structures to the
purchasing public.
It should not take long to create an adequate specification
with the right technical people sitting in a room with a strong financial interest
to build a new small value payment infrastructure. The work I predict will take
less than a year because most of the critical elements are part of current
financial data standards. Some needs based architectures require redemption of
goods by description of the goods and not of the value of goods and your new protocol
needs to support this practice.
I know there will be lobbyists and politicians in Gucci
suits representing well-heeled constituents screaming that institutions such as
you should not dictate protocols for good capitalists. I note that standards
are not regulations, more like guidelines, and only provide a common language
and not necessarily a regulated methodology. Allowing innovation is good for all including
people in jeans and a tee shirt, like me.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Ed Oppenheimer
No comments:
Post a Comment