The evidence is clear and the trend shows payment cards
slowly leaving the retail payment infrastructure. Large retailers that issued
their own private label cards sold their stock and processing to professional
payment services firms. Telephone operators and Internet service firms assume
the role previously occupied by issuers and acquirers. Retailers create their
own payment initiation protocol to preempt hostile acquiring agents from increasing
their fees. Something must give or retailers’ slim margins will force consumer
payments back to riskier payment methods such as cash or paper check.
On the horizon sits a new form of payment architecture,
cheaper, safer, and faster than anything card technologies offer. Clearing,
settlement, and notification to the parties of transactions take place at the
speed of light without middlemen pocketing fees from lack of a physical token
at a payment acceptance device or a chargeback for dubious causes. The only
question remaining is will the change occur quickly once a small value real
time payment system becomes ubiquitous or will the old guard fight back with
discounts and incentives. Will a payment
system that works equally well regardless if the payee is a retailer, a
charity, or a government, trump a system loaded down with fees and designed only
for retailer payees?
Diagram 30: Small Value Real Time Payment System
The payer financial institution (FI) retrieves the payee
data from a common data store and acts on the instructions from the payer and
notifies the payee and payer in real time about the results of the transaction
and then moves the value of the payment to the payee’s FI. This is a valuable
service and warrant fees (including a reasonable profit). If the infrastructure exists (and it seems
that plans are under way for its completion; see positive movements in that
direction http://paymentnetworks.blogspot.com/2014/10/movement-to-small-value-gross-real-time.html
) then the funds for the infrastructure and the processing environment must
come from somewhere. The operators need to charge a fee similar to what the Fed
charges for use of Fed Wire, namely whatever is necessary to cover the cost of
running and maintaining the system, however without profit. FIs also can charge
whatever fees they want as long as they do not collude with each other to set one
illegal fee. Payers and Payees negotiate with each other to determine the payer
of the bank fees.
So what will a few bits of data cost to transport from one
point to another. That is a question of conjecture but logically it will cost a
lot less than what payers and payees pay for the archaic structure currently
run by huge monopolies.
Next Blog: The
new entrepreneurs selling a push system to an eager public
No comments:
Post a Comment